Power and Carbon Footprint Evaluation and Optimization in Transitioning Data Centres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63318/waujpasv3i2_28Keywords:
Energy efficiency, Energy consumption analysis, Renewable energy, Linear power model, Cubic power model, CloudSimAbstract
Data centers are among the largest consumers of energy and significant contributors to global carbon emissions. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two mathematical energy consumption models—the linear and cubic models—within a simulated cloud data center environment using the CloudSim toolkit. Key performance indicators were analyzed, including total energy consumption, carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, cost, power usage effectiveness (PUE), carbon usage effectiveness (CUE), response time (latency), and packet loss, under varying workload conditions.The cubic model demonstrated greater sensitivity to workload fluctuations and more accurately captured the dynamics of energy consumption in high-utilization environments, while the linear model offered computational simplicity and conservative estimates. The integration of 50% renewable energy sources led to substantial reductions in both emissions and operational costs. Specifically, the linear model recorded a 33.3% reduction in CO₂ emissions, a 71.5% improvement in CUE, and a 15.4% decrease in cost, while the cubic model achieved a 33.3% reduction in CO₂ emissions, a 23.2% improvement in CUE, and a 24.6% decrease in operational cost—demonstrating the effectiveness of clean energy adoption without compromising system performance or service quality.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This journal uses Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommerical 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Copyright of articles
Authors retain copyright of their articles published in this journal.